SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Pervis Ellison: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 9 games

92

percentil

Pervis Ellison
Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is Pervis Ellison?

The evidence

Pervis Ellison · Defensive impact: 92th percentile (DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

92 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+42) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

Pervis Ellison: what moved most is Rebounding

19 percentilcompared against: 70 percentil (-51) · Pervis Ellison, from 1994-95 to 1999-00

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 4.4 minutes per game across 9 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 92th percentile

    DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.7 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact92th percentile

    DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding9th percentile

    1.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact92th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding9th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 41th percentile → 0th percentile (-41) · Playmaking: 17th percentile → 5th percentile (-12) · Rebounding: 78th percentile → 9th percentile (-69)

  • 1994-9578th percentile

    55 games · 19.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    41th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 1995-9684th percentile

    69 games · 20.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    84th percentile
  • 1996-9767th percentile

    6 games · 20.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    25th percentile
    Rebounding
    67th percentile
  • 1997-9849th percentile

    33 games · 13.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    28th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 1999-0028th percentile

    30 games · 9.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    28th percentile
  • 2000-019th percentile

    9 games · 4.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 9 games · 4.4 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-13

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.