SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Andrew Lang: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1999-00 · 19 games

89

percentil

Andrew Lang
Confidence: lowData through: 1999-00

The question

What kind of player is Andrew Lang?

The evidence

Andrew Lang · Defensive impact: 89th percentile (DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

89 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+39) · 379 players with a sample in 1999-00

Andrew Lang: what moved most is Scoring

20 percentilcompared against: 64 percentil (-44) · Andrew Lang, from 1994-95 to 1996-97

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 12.8 minutes per game across 19 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 89th percentile

    DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 379 players with a sample in 1999-00. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring14th percentile

    3.1 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact89th percentile

    DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding46th percentile

    3.2 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact89th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding46th percentile

    Average · 3.2 rebounds per game

  • Scoring14th percentile

    Very low · 3.1 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 59th percentile → 14th percentile (-45) · Playmaking: 31th percentile → 3th percentile (-28) · Rebounding: 78th percentile → 46th percentile (-32)

  • 1994-9559th percentile

    82 games · 28.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 1995-9668th percentile

    71 games · 33.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    68th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    84th percentile
  • 1996-9736th percentile

    52 games · 23.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    36th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    77th percentile
  • 1997-9811th percentile

    57 games · 12.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    40th percentile
  • 1998-9918th percentile

    21 games · 18.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    18th percentile
    Playmaking
    19th percentile
    Rebounding
    68th percentile
  • 1999-0014th percentile

    19 games · 12.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    46th percentile

Context

1999-00 · 19 games · 12.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 379 measured players in 1999-00 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1999-00 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.