SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

J.R. Reid: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 6 games

63

percentil

J.R. Reid
Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is J.R. Reid?

The evidence

J.R. Reid · Defensive impact: 63th percentile (DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

63 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+13) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

J.R. Reid: what moved most is Rebounding

9 percentilcompared against: 59 percentil (-50) · J.R. Reid, from 1994-95 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 6.5 minutes per game across 6 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 63th percentile

    DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring3th percentile

    1.7 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact63th percentile

    DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding9th percentile

    1.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Rebounding9th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game

  • Scoring3th percentile

    Very low · 1.7 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 44th percentile → 3th percentile (-41) · Playmaking: 21th percentile → 3th percentile (-18) · Rebounding: 73th percentile → 9th percentile (-64)

  • 1994-9573th percentile

    81 games · 19.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    44th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    73th percentile
  • 1995-9661th percentile

    65 games · 20.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    41th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    61th percentile
  • 1997-9840th percentile

    79 games · 14.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    30th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    40th percentile
  • 1998-9973th percentile

    41 games · 25.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    43th percentile
    Rebounding
    73th percentile
  • 1999-0049th percentile

    34 games · 17.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    23th percentile
    Playmaking
    13th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 2000-019th percentile

    6 games · 6.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 6 games · 6.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.