Professional DNA

Andrew DeClercq: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2004-05 · 8 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2004-05

The question

What kind of player is Andrew DeClercq?

The evidence

Andrew DeClercq · Defensive impact: 10th percentile (DBPM -1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

10 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-40) · 389 players with a sample in 2004-05

Andrew DeClercq: what moved most is Rebounding

7 percentilcompared against: 58 percentil (-51) · Andrew DeClercq, from 1999-00 to 2004-05

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 6.1 minutes per game across 8 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 10th percentile
DBPM -1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 389 players with a sample in 2004-05. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring1th percentile
1.1 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.0 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact10th percentile
DBPM -1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding7th percentile
1.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact10th percentile
Very low · DBPM -1.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding7th percentile
Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game
Scoring1th percentile
Very low · 1.1 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 43th percentile → 1th percentile (-42) · Playmaking: 22th percentile → 0th percentile (-22) · Rebounding: 75th percentile → 7th percentile (-68)

1999-0075th percentile
82 games · 22.3 minutes per game
Scoring
43th percentile
Playmaking
22th percentile
Rebounding
75th percentile
2000-0151th percentile
67 games · 13.5 minutes per game
Scoring
20th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
51th percentile
2001-0234th percentile
61 games · 10.4 minutes per game
Scoring
10th percentile
Playmaking
11th percentile
Rebounding
34th percentile
2002-0363th percentile
77 games · 17.2 minutes per game
Scoring
27th percentile
Playmaking
20th percentile
Rebounding
63th percentile
2003-0466th percentile
71 games · 17.1 minutes per game
Scoring
12th percentile
Playmaking
19th percentile
Rebounding
66th percentile
2004-057th percentile
8 games · 6.1 minutes per game
Scoring
1th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
7th percentile

Context

2004-05 · 8 games · 6.1 minutes per game · Percentile against 389 measured players in 2004-05 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2004-05 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.