SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Joe Smith: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2010-11 · 16 games

78

percentil

Joe Smith
Confidence: lowData through: 2010-11

The question

What kind of player is Joe Smith?

The evidence

Joe Smith · Defensive impact: 78th percentile (DBPM 0.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

78 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+28) · 400 players with a sample in 2010-11

Joe Smith: what moved most is Rebounding

20 percentilcompared against: 77 percentil (-57) · Joe Smith, from 2005-06 to 2009-10

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 4.3 minutes per game across 16 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 78th percentile

    DBPM 0.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 400 players with a sample in 2010-11. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.5 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact78th percentile

    DBPM 0.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    1.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact78th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 0.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 58th percentile → 0th percentile (-58) · Playmaking: 31th percentile → 5th percentile (-26) · Rebounding: 78th percentile → 8th percentile (-70)

  • 2005-0678th percentile

    44 games · 20.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    58th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 2006-0785th percentile

    65 games · 23.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    55th percentile
    Playmaking
    29th percentile
    Rebounding
    85th percentile
  • 2007-0878th percentile

    77 games · 22.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    64th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    78th percentile
  • 2008-0968th percentile

    57 games · 19.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    42th percentile
    Playmaking
    26th percentile
    Rebounding
    68th percentile
  • 2009-1032th percentile

    64 games · 9.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    7th percentile
    Rebounding
    32th percentile
  • 2010-118th percentile

    16 games · 4.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile

Context

2010-11 · 16 games · 4.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 400 measured players in 2010-11 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2010-11 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-14

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.