SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Eldridge Recasner: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2001-02 · 6 games

39

percentil

Eldridge Recasner
Confidence: lowData through: 2001-02

The question

What kind of player is Eldridge Recasner?

The evidence

Eldridge Recasner · Defensive impact: 39th percentile (DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

39 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-11) · 380 players with a sample in 2001-02

Eldridge Recasner: what moved most is Scoring

9 percentilcompared against: 49 percentil (-40) · Eldridge Recasner, from 1996-97 to 1998-99

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.5 minutes per game across 6 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 39th percentile

    DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 380 players with a sample in 2001-02. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.8 points per game

  • Playmaking28th percentile

    0.8 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact39th percentile

    DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact39th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking28th percentile

    Low · 0.8 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.8 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 38th percentile → 0th percentile (-38) · Playmaking: 45th percentile → 28th percentile (-17) · Rebounding: 17th percentile → 0th percentile (-17)

  • 1996-9738th percentile

    71 games · 17.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    38th percentile
    Playmaking
    45th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 1997-9859th percentile

    59 games · 24.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    60th percentile
    Rebounding
    34th percentile
  • 1998-9927th percentile

    44 games · 16.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    27th percentile
    Playmaking
    66th percentile
    Rebounding
    15th percentile
  • 1999-001th percentile

    7 games · 4.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    22th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 2000-018th percentile

    43 games · 9.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    32th percentile
    Rebounding
    6th percentile
  • 2001-020th percentile

    6 games · 5.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    28th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2001-02 · 6 games · 5.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 380 measured players in 2001-02 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2001-02 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.