SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Greg Ostertag: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2005-06 · 60 games

94

percentil

Greg Ostertag
Confidence: lowData through: 2005-06

The question

What kind of player is Greg Ostertag?

The evidence

Greg Ostertag · Defensive impact: 94th percentile (DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

94 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+44) · 404 players with a sample in 2005-06

Greg Ostertag: what moved most is Playmaking

39 percentilcompared against: 17 percentil (+22) · Greg Ostertag, from 2000-01 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 13.5 minutes per game across 60 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 94th percentile

    DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 404 players with a sample in 2005-06. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring12th percentile

    2.4 points per game

  • Playmaking42th percentile

    1.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact94th percentile

    DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rim32th percentile

    55.1 % · 89 attempts

  • Rebounding59th percentile

    3.8 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact94th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking42th percentile

    Average · 1.0 assists per game

  • Finishing at the rim32th percentile

    Low · 55.1 % · 89 attempts

  • Scoring12th percentile

    Very low · 2.4 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 26th percentile → 12th percentile (-14) · Playmaking: 5th percentile → 42th percentile (+37) · Rebounding: 75th percentile → 59th percentile (-16)

  • 2000-015th percentile

    81 games · 18.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    26th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    75th percentile
  • 2001-0225th percentile

    74 games · 15.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    25th percentile
    Rebounding
    63th percentile
  • 2002-0320th percentile

    81 games · 23.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    34th percentile
    Playmaking
    20th percentile
    Rebounding
    81th percentile
  • 2003-0453th percentile

    78 games · 27.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    47th percentile
    Playmaking
    53th percentile
    Rebounding
    90th percentile
  • 2004-0521th percentile

    56 games · 9.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    42th percentile
  • 2005-0642th percentile

    60 games · 13.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    42th percentile
    Rebounding
    59th percentile

Context

2005-06 · 60 games · 13.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 404 measured players in 2005-06 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2005-06 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.