Professional DNA

Pat Cummings: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1990-91 · 4 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1990-91

The question

What kind of player is Pat Cummings?

The evidence

Pat Cummings · Defensive impact: 33th percentile (DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

33 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-17) · 336 players with a sample in 1990-91

Pat Cummings: what moved most is Rebounding

22 percentilcompared against: 77 percentil (-55) · Pat Cummings, from 1985-86 to 1989-90

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 6.5 minutes per game across 4 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 33th percentile
DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 336 players with a sample in 1990-91. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring16th percentile
3.8 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.0 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact33th percentile
DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding11th percentile
1.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact33th percentile
Low · DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Scoring16th percentile
Very low · 3.8 points per game
Rebounding11th percentile
Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 81th percentile → 16th percentile (-65) · Playmaking: 45th percentile → 0th percentile (-45) · Rebounding: 95th percentile → 11th percentile (-84)

1985-8695th percentile
31 games · 32.5 minutes per game
Scoring
81th percentile
Playmaking
45th percentile
Rebounding
95th percentile
1986-8781th percentile
49 games · 21.6 minutes per game
Scoring
50th percentile
Playmaking
20th percentile
Rebounding
81th percentile
1987-8858th percentile
62 games · 15.3 minutes per game
Scoring
27th percentile
Playmaking
13th percentile
Rebounding
58th percentile
1988-8974th percentile
53 games · 20.7 minutes per game
Scoring
53th percentile
Playmaking
28th percentile
Rebounding
74th percentile
1989-9033th percentile
37 games · 10.6 minutes per game
Scoring
26th percentile
Playmaking
9th percentile
Rebounding
33th percentile
1990-9111th percentile
4 games · 6.5 minutes per game
Scoring
16th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
11th percentile

Context

1990-91 · 4 games · 6.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 336 measured players in 1990-91 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1990-91 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.