SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

David Wingate: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 1 games

100

percentil

David Wingate
Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is David Wingate?

The evidence

David Wingate · Defensive impact: 100th percentile (DBPM 4.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

100 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+50) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

David Wingate: what moved most is Playmaking

64 percentilcompared against: 21 percentil (+43) · David Wingate, from 1995-96 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 9.0 minutes per game across 1 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 100th percentile

    DBPM 4.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring42th percentile

    6.0 points per game

  • Playmaking64th percentile

    2.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    DBPM 4.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 4.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring42th percentile

    Average · 6.0 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 18th percentile → 42th percentile (+24) · Playmaking: 34th percentile → 64th percentile (+30) · Rebounding: 2th percentile → 0th percentile (-2)

  • 1995-9634th percentile

    60 games · 11.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    18th percentile
    Playmaking
    34th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile
  • 1996-9741th percentile

    65 games · 14.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    19th percentile
    Playmaking
    41th percentile
    Rebounding
    6th percentile
  • 1997-9816th percentile

    58 games · 9.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    13th percentile
  • 1998-995th percentile

    20 games · 4.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 1999-0010th percentile

    7 games · 4.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 2000-0164th percentile

    1 games · 9.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    42th percentile
    Playmaking
    64th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 1 games · 9.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.