SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Bill Garnett: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1985-86 · 80 games

79

percentil

Bill Garnett
Confidence: lowData through: 1985-86

The question

What kind of player is Bill Garnett?

The evidence

Bill Garnett · Defensive impact: 79th percentile (DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

79 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+29) · 285 players with a sample in 1985-86

Bill Garnett: what moved most is Rebounding

59 percentilcompared against: 73 percentil (-14) · Bill Garnett, from 1982-83 to 1983-84

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 15.0 minutes per game across 80 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 79th percentile

    DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 285 players with a sample in 1985-86. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring19th percentile

    4.3 points per game

  • Playmaking33th percentile

    1.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact79th percentile

    DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding52th percentile

    3.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact79th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking33th percentile

    Low · 1.2 assists per game

  • Scoring19th percentile

    Very low · 4.3 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 36th percentile → 19th percentile (-17) · Playmaking: 35th percentile → 33th percentile (-2) · Rebounding: 73th percentile → 52th percentile (-21)

  • 1982-8373th percentile

    75 games · 18.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    36th percentile
    Playmaking
    35th percentile
    Rebounding
    73th percentile
  • 1983-8463th percentile

    80 games · 19.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    27th percentile
    Playmaking
    44th percentile
    Rebounding
    63th percentile
  • 1984-8562th percentile

    65 games · 17.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    38th percentile
    Playmaking
    28th percentile
    Rebounding
    62th percentile
  • 1985-8652th percentile

    80 games · 15.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    19th percentile
    Playmaking
    33th percentile
    Rebounding
    52th percentile

Context

1985-86 · 80 games · 15.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 285 measured players in 1985-86 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1985-86 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.