SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Mark West: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1999-00 · 22 games

89

percentil

Mark West
Confidence: lowData through: 1999-00

The question

What kind of player is Mark West?

The evidence

Mark West · Defensive impact: 89th percentile (DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

89 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+39) · 378 players with a sample in 1999-00

Mark West: what moved most is Rebounding

26 percentilcompared against: 82 percentil (-56) · Mark West, from 1994-95 to 1995-96

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.8 minutes per game across 22 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 89th percentile

    DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 378 players with a sample in 1999-00. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.7 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    0.1 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact89th percentile

    DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    1.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact89th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    Very low · 1.4 rebounds per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    Very low · 0.1 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 48th percentile → 0th percentile (-48) · Playmaking: 4th percentile → 0th percentile (-4) · Rebounding: 82th percentile → 8th percentile (-74)

  • 1994-9582th percentile

    67 games · 23.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    48th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    82th percentile
  • 1995-9641th percentile

    47 games · 14.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    41th percentile
  • 1996-9741th percentile

    70 games · 13.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    41th percentile
  • 1997-985th percentile

    15 games · 7.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    2th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    5th percentile
  • 1998-9934th percentile

    49 games · 10.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    34th percentile
  • 1999-008th percentile

    22 games · 5.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile

Context

1999-00 · 22 games · 5.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 378 measured players in 1999-00 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1999-00 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.