SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Steve Johnson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1990-91 · 24 games

35

percentil

Steve Johnson
Confidence: lowData through: 1990-91

The question

What kind of player is Steve Johnson?

The evidence

Steve Johnson · Defensive impact: 35th percentile (DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

35 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-15) · 335 players with a sample in 1990-91

Steve Johnson: what moved most is Scoring

21 percentilcompared against: 74 percentil (-53) · Steve Johnson, from 1985-86 to 1989-90

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 9.5 minutes per game across 24 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 35th percentile

    DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 335 players with a sample in 1990-91. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring16th percentile

    3.8 points per game

  • Playmaking22th percentile

    0.7 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact35th percentile

    DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding32th percentile

    2.4 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact35th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding32th percentile

    Low · 2.4 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking22th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 assists per game

  • Scoring16th percentile

    Very low · 3.8 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 73th percentile → 16th percentile (-57) · Playmaking: 39th percentile → 22th percentile (-17) · Rebounding: 82th percentile → 32th percentile (-50)

  • 1985-8673th percentile

    71 games · 25.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    73th percentile
    Playmaking
    39th percentile
    Rebounding
    82th percentile
  • 1986-8784th percentile

    79 games · 29.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    84th percentile
    Playmaking
    56th percentile
    Rebounding
    85th percentile
  • 1987-8880th percentile

    43 games · 24.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    80th percentile
    Playmaking
    37th percentile
    Rebounding
    75th percentile
  • 1988-8958th percentile

    72 games · 20.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    58th percentile
    Playmaking
    45th percentile
    Rebounding
    70th percentile
  • 1989-9026th percentile

    25 games · 10.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    26th percentile
    Playmaking
    23th percentile
    Rebounding
    26th percentile
  • 1990-9116th percentile

    24 games · 9.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    16th percentile
    Playmaking
    22th percentile
    Rebounding
    32th percentile

Context

1990-91 · 24 games · 9.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 335 measured players in 1990-91 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1990-91 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.