SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

John Lambert: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1981-82 · 63 games

44

percentil

John Lambert
Confidence: lowData through: 1981-82

The question

What kind of player is John Lambert?

The evidence

John Lambert · Defensive impact: 44th percentile (DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

44 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-6) · 282 players with a sample in 1981-82

John Lambert: what moved most is Rebounding

31 percentilcompared against: 52 percentil (-21) · John Lambert, from 1976-77 to 1980-81

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 12.1 minutes per game across 63 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 44th percentile

    DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 282 players with a sample in 1981-82. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring11th percentile

    3.3 points per game

  • Playmaking9th percentile

    0.6 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact44th percentile

    DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding40th percentile

    2.8 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact44th percentile

    Average · DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding40th percentile

    Average · 2.8 rebounds per game

  • Scoring11th percentile

    Very low · 3.3 points per game

  • Playmaking9th percentile

    Very low · 0.6 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 4th percentile → 11th percentile (+7) · Playmaking: 7th percentile → 9th percentile (+2) · Rebounding: 29th percentile → 40th percentile (+11)

  • 1976-7729th percentile

    63 games · 8.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    7th percentile
    Rebounding
    29th percentile
  • 1977-7860th percentile

    76 games · 14.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    10th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    60th percentile
  • 1978-7957th percentile

    70 games · 14.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    7th percentile
    Rebounding
    57th percentile
  • 1979-8062th percentile

    74 games · 17.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    21th percentile
    Playmaking
    11th percentile
    Rebounding
    62th percentile
  • 1980-8122th percentile

    46 games · 10.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    7th percentile
    Rebounding
    22th percentile
  • 1981-8240th percentile

    63 games · 12.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    9th percentile
    Rebounding
    40th percentile

Context

1981-82 · 63 games · 12.1 minutes per game · Percentile against 282 measured players in 1981-82 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1981-82 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.