SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Jeff Lamp: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1988-89 · 37 games

33

percentil

Jeff Lamp
Confidence: lowData through: 1988-89

The question

What kind of player is Jeff Lamp?

The evidence

Jeff Lamp · Defensive impact: 33th percentile (DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

33 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-17) · 315 players with a sample in 1988-89

Jeff Lamp: what moved most is Scoring

1 percentilcompared against: 29 percentil (-28) · Jeff Lamp, from 1981-82 to 1987-88

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 4.8 minutes per game across 37 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 33th percentile

    DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 315 players with a sample in 1988-89. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring2th percentile

    1.6 points per game

  • Playmaking9th percentile

    0.4 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact33th percentile

    DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding4th percentile

    0.9 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact33th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking9th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 assists per game

  • Rebounding4th percentile

    Very low · 0.9 rebounds per game

  • Scoring2th percentile

    Very low · 1.6 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 22th percentile → 2th percentile (-20) · Playmaking: 6th percentile → 9th percentile (+3) · Rebounding: 9th percentile → 4th percentile (-5)

  • 1981-8222th percentile

    54 games · 11.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    22th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile
  • 1982-8321th percentile

    59 games · 11.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    21th percentile
    Playmaking
    22th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile
  • 1983-8426th percentile

    64 games · 10.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    26th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    5th percentile
  • 1985-8645th percentile

    74 games · 17.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    45th percentile
    Playmaking
    47th percentile
    Rebounding
    39th percentile
  • 1987-880th percentile

    3 games · 2.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 1988-892th percentile

    37 games · 4.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    2th percentile
    Playmaking
    9th percentile
    Rebounding
    4th percentile

Context

1988-89 · 37 games · 4.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 315 measured players in 1988-89 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1988-89 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.