SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Pace Mannion: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1988-89 · 10 games

98

percentil

Pace Mannion
Confidence: lowData through: 1988-89

The question

What kind of player is Pace Mannion?

The evidence

Pace Mannion · Defensive impact: 98th percentile (DBPM 2.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

98 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+48) · 316 players with a sample in 1988-89

Pace Mannion: what moved most is Playmaking

2 percentilcompared against: 33 percentil (-31) · Pace Mannion, from 1983-84 to 1988-89

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 3.2 minutes per game across 10 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 98th percentile

    DBPM 2.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 316 players with a sample in 1988-89. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.8 points per game

  • Playmaking2th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact98th percentile

    DBPM 2.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.5 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact98th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.8: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking2th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.8 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 5th percentile → 0th percentile (-5) · Playmaking: 17th percentile → 2th percentile (-15) · Rebounding: 5th percentile → 0th percentile (-5)

  • 1983-8417th percentile

    57 games · 8.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    5th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    5th percentile
  • 1984-8521th percentile

    34 games · 5.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    5th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile
  • 1985-8624th percentile

    57 games · 11.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    24th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile
  • 1986-8756th percentile

    23 games · 12.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    56th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 1987-8849th percentile

    35 games · 13.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    49th percentile
    Rebounding
    14th percentile
  • 1988-892th percentile

    10 games · 3.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    2th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

1988-89 · 10 games · 3.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 316 measured players in 1988-89 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1988-89 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.