Professional DNA

Tim McCormick: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1991-92 · 22 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1991-92

The question

What kind of player is Tim McCormick?

The evidence

Tim McCormick · Defensive impact: 56th percentile (DBPM 0.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

56 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+6) · 341 players with a sample in 1991-92

Tim McCormick: what moved most is Rebounding

31 percentilcompared against: 86 percentil (-55) · Tim McCormick, from 1986-87 to 1988-89

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 4.9 minutes per game across 22 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 56th percentile
DBPM 0.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 341 players with a sample in 1991-92. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring4th percentile
1.9 points per game
Playmaking8th percentile
0.4 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact56th percentile
DBPM 0.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding16th percentile
1.5 rebounds per game

Limitations

Rebounding16th percentile
Very low · 1.5 rebounds per game
Playmaking8th percentile
Very low · 0.4 assists per game
Scoring4th percentile
Very low · 1.9 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 72th percentile → 4th percentile (-68) · Playmaking: 41th percentile → 8th percentile (-33) · Rebounding: 87th percentile → 16th percentile (-71)

1986-8787th percentile
81 games · 34.8 minutes per game
Scoring
72th percentile
Playmaking
41th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
1987-8884th percentile
70 games · 30.2 minutes per game
Scoring
66th percentile
Playmaking
51th percentile
Rebounding
84th percentile
1988-8948th percentile
81 games · 15.5 minutes per game
Scoring
30th percentile
Playmaking
21th percentile
Rebounding
48th percentile
1989-9016th percentile
18 games · 6.4 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
16th percentile
1990-9142th percentile
56 games · 12.3 minutes per game
Scoring
24th percentile
Playmaking
17th percentile
Rebounding
42th percentile
1991-9216th percentile
22 games · 4.9 minutes per game
Scoring
4th percentile
Playmaking
8th percentile
Rebounding
16th percentile

Context

1991-92 · 22 games · 4.9 minutes per game · Percentile against 341 measured players in 1991-92 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1991-92 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.