Professional DNA

Hank McDowell: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1986-87 · 7 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1986-87

The question

What kind of player is Hank McDowell?

The evidence

Hank McDowell · Defensive impact: 49th percentile (DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

49 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-1) · 286 players with a sample in 1986-87

Hank McDowell: what moved most is Playmaking

5 percentilcompared against: 14 percentil (-9) · Hank McDowell, from 1981-82 to 1982-83

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 10.0 minutes per game across 7 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 49th percentile
DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 286 players with a sample in 1986-87. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring9th percentile
3.1 points per game
Playmaking2th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact49th percentile
DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding40th percentile
2.7 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact49th percentile
Average · DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding40th percentile
Average · 2.7 rebounds per game
Scoring9th percentile
Very low · 3.1 points per game
Playmaking2th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 10th percentile → 9th percentile (-1) · Playmaking: 14th percentile → 2th percentile (-12) · Rebounding: 51th percentile → 40th percentile (-11)

1981-8214th percentile
30 games · 11.2 minutes per game
Scoring
10th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
51th percentile
1982-833th percentile
56 games · 9.0 minutes per game
Scoring
6th percentile
Playmaking
3th percentile
Rebounding
27th percentile
1983-8411th percentile
57 games · 10.7 minutes per game
Scoring
15th percentile
Playmaking
11th percentile
Rebounding
42th percentile
1984-852th percentile
34 games · 3.9 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
1th percentile
1985-865th percentile
22 games · 9.3 minutes per game
Scoring
8th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
31th percentile
1986-872th percentile
7 games · 10.0 minutes per game
Scoring
9th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
40th percentile

Context

1986-87 · 7 games · 10.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 286 measured players in 1986-87 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1986-87 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.