SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Mark McNamara: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1990-91 · 2 games

38

percentil

Mark McNamara
Confidence: lowData through: 1990-91

The question

What kind of player is Mark McNamara?

The evidence

Mark McNamara · Defensive impact: 38th percentile (DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

38 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-12) · 336 players with a sample in 1990-91

Mark McNamara: what moved most is Rebounding

38 percentilcompared against: 16 percentil (+22) · Mark McNamara, from 1984-85 to 1986-87

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 6.5 minutes per game across 2 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 38th percentile

    DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 336 players with a sample in 1990-91. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.0 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    0.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact38th percentile

    DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding24th percentile

    2.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact38th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding24th percentile

    Very low · 2.0 rebounds per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 7th percentile → 0th percentile (-7) · Playmaking: 0th percentile → 0th percentile (0) · Rebounding: 16th percentile → 24th percentile (+8)

  • 1984-8516th percentile

    45 games · 6.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    7th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    16th percentile
  • 1986-8749th percentile

    11 games · 10.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    10th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 1987-8857th percentile

    42 games · 13.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    57th percentile
  • 1988-8936th percentile

    39 games · 8.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    4th percentile
    Rebounding
    36th percentile
  • 1989-9024th percentile

    33 games · 5.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    24th percentile
  • 1990-9124th percentile

    2 games · 6.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    24th percentile

Context

1990-91 · 2 games · 6.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 336 measured players in 1990-91 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1990-91 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.