Professional DNA

Paul Mokeski: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1990-91 · 36 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1990-91

The question

What kind of player is Paul Mokeski?

The evidence

Paul Mokeski · Defensive impact: 38th percentile (DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

38 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-12) · 335 players with a sample in 1990-91

Paul Mokeski: what moved most is Rebounding

37 percentilcompared against: 40 percentil (-3) · Paul Mokeski, from 1985-86 to 1987-88

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 7.1 minutes per game across 36 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 38th percentile
DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 335 players with a sample in 1990-91. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring2th percentile
1.6 points per game
Playmaking6th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact38th percentile
DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding21th percentile
1.9 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact38th percentile
Low · DBPM -0.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding21th percentile
Very low · 1.9 rebounds per game
Playmaking6th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Scoring2th percentile
Very low · 1.6 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 9th percentile → 2th percentile (-7) · Playmaking: 16th percentile → 6th percentile (-10) · Rebounding: 48th percentile → 21th percentile (-27)

1985-8648th percentile
45 games · 11.6 minutes per game
Scoring
9th percentile
Playmaking
16th percentile
Rebounding
48th percentile
1986-8732th percentile
62 games · 10.1 minutes per game
Scoring
5th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
32th percentile
1987-8857th percentile
60 games · 14.1 minutes per game
Scoring
17th percentile
Playmaking
6th percentile
Rebounding
57th percentile
1988-8935th percentile
74 games · 9.3 minutes per game
Scoring
6th percentile
Playmaking
13th percentile
Rebounding
35th percentile
1989-9036th percentile
38 games · 11.8 minutes per game
Scoring
19th percentile
Playmaking
9th percentile
Rebounding
36th percentile
1990-9121th percentile
36 games · 7.1 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
6th percentile
Rebounding
21th percentile

Context

1990-91 · 36 games · 7.1 minutes per game · Percentile against 335 measured players in 1990-91 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1990-91 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.