SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Kurt Rambis: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1994-95 · 26 games

77

percentil

Kurt Rambis
Confidence: lowData through: 1994-95

The question

What kind of player is Kurt Rambis?

The evidence

Kurt Rambis · Defensive impact: 77th percentile (DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

77 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+27) · 348 players with a sample in 1994-95

Kurt Rambis: what moved most is Rebounding

10 percentilcompared against: 63 percentil (-53) · Kurt Rambis, from 1989-90 to 1994-95

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 7.5 minutes per game across 26 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 77th percentile

    DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 348 players with a sample in 1994-95. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring1th percentile

    1.7 points per game

  • Playmaking17th percentile

    0.6 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact77th percentile

    DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding10th percentile

    1.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact77th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking17th percentile

    Very low · 0.6 assists per game

  • Rebounding10th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game

  • Scoring1th percentile

    Very low · 1.7 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 37th percentile → 1th percentile (-36) · Playmaking: 53th percentile → 17th percentile (-36) · Rebounding: 86th percentile → 10th percentile (-76)

  • 1989-9086th percentile

    74 games · 25.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    37th percentile
    Playmaking
    53th percentile
    Rebounding
    86th percentile
  • 1990-9161th percentile

    62 games · 14.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    33th percentile
    Rebounding
    61th percentile
  • 1991-9260th percentile

    28 games · 13.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    39th percentile
    Rebounding
    60th percentile
  • 1992-9349th percentile

    72 games · 11.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    20th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 1993-9457th percentile

    50 games · 12.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    57th percentile
  • 1994-9510th percentile

    26 games · 7.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    10th percentile

Context

1994-95 · 26 games · 7.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 348 measured players in 1994-95 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1994-95 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.