Professional DNA

Tree Rollins: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1994-95 · 51 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1994-95

The question

What kind of player is Tree Rollins?

The evidence

Tree Rollins · Defensive impact: 83th percentile (DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

83 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+33) · 348 players with a sample in 1994-95

Tree Rollins: what moved most is Rebounding

21 percentilcompared against: 49 percentil (-28) · Tree Rollins, from 1989-90 to 1990-91

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 9.4 minutes per game across 51 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 83th percentile
DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 348 players with a sample in 1994-95. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring0th percentile
1.2 points per game
Playmaking1th percentile
0.2 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact83th percentile
DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding22th percentile
1.9 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact83th percentile
Very high · DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Rebounding22th percentile
Very low · 1.9 rebounds per game
Playmaking1th percentile
Very low · 0.2 assists per game
Scoring0th percentile
Very low · 1.2 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 10th percentile → 0th percentile (-10) · Playmaking: 14th percentile → 1th percentile (-13) · Rebounding: 49th percentile → 22th percentile (-27)

1989-9049th percentile
48 games · 14.0 minutes per game
Scoring
10th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
49th percentile
1990-917th percentile
37 games · 5.5 minutes per game
Scoring
0th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
7th percentile
1991-9239th percentile
59 games · 11.8 minutes per game
Scoring
5th percentile
Playmaking
4th percentile
Rebounding
39th percentile
1992-9311th percentile
42 games · 5.9 minutes per game
Scoring
0th percentile
Playmaking
1th percentile
Rebounding
11th percentile
1993-9424th percentile
45 games · 8.5 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
24th percentile
1994-9522th percentile
51 games · 9.4 minutes per game
Scoring
0th percentile
Playmaking
1th percentile
Rebounding
22th percentile

Context

1994-95 · 51 games · 9.4 minutes per game · Percentile against 348 measured players in 1994-95 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1994-95 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.