SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Jeff Ruland: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1992-93 · 11 games

29

percentil

Jeff Ruland
Confidence: lowData through: 1992-93

The question

What kind of player is Jeff Ruland?

The evidence

Jeff Ruland · Defensive impact: 29th percentile (DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

29 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-21) · 344 players with a sample in 1992-93

Jeff Ruland: what moved most is Scoring

25 percentilcompared against: 91 percentil (-66) · Jeff Ruland, from 1983-84 to 1986-87

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.0 minutes per game across 11 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 29th percentile

    DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 344 players with a sample in 1992-93. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring1th percentile

    1.1 points per game

  • Playmaking1th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact29th percentile

    DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding15th percentile

    1.6 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact29th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding15th percentile

    Very low · 1.6 rebounds per game

  • Scoring1th percentile

    Very low · 1.1 points per game

  • Playmaking1th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 95th percentile → 1th percentile (-94) · Playmaking: 82th percentile → 1th percentile (-81) · Rebounding: 99th percentile → 15th percentile (-84)

  • 1983-8495th percentile

    75 games · 41.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    95th percentile
    Playmaking
    82th percentile
    Rebounding
    99th percentile
  • 1984-8587th percentile

    37 games · 38.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    87th percentile
    Playmaking
    86th percentile
    Rebounding
    98th percentile
  • 1985-8690th percentile

    30 games · 37.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    90th percentile
    Playmaking
    90th percentile
    Rebounding
    98th percentile
  • 1986-8754th percentile

    5 games · 23.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    54th percentile
    Playmaking
    56th percentile
    Rebounding
    75th percentile
  • 1991-9221th percentile

    13 games · 16.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    21th percentile
    Playmaking
    8th percentile
    Rebounding
    55th percentile
  • 1992-931th percentile

    11 games · 5.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    15th percentile

Context

1992-93 · 11 games · 5.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 344 measured players in 1992-93 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1992-93 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-08

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.