SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Granville Waiters: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1987-88 · 22 games

83

percentil

Granville Waiters
Confidence: lowData through: 1987-88

The question

What kind of player is Granville Waiters?

The evidence

Granville Waiters · Defensive impact: 83th percentile (DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

83 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+33) · 287 players with a sample in 1987-88

Granville Waiters: what moved most is Rebounding

13 percentilcompared against: 43 percentil (-30) · Granville Waiters, from 1983-84 to 1985-86

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 5.2 minutes per game across 22 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 287 players with a sample in 1987-88. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.8 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    0.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding11th percentile

    1.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding11th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.8 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 15th percentile → 0th percentile (-15) · Playmaking: 17th percentile → 0th percentile (-17) · Rebounding: 47th percentile → 11th percentile (-36)

  • 1983-8447th percentile

    78 games · 13.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    47th percentile
  • 1984-8539th percentile

    62 games · 11.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    39th percentile
  • 1985-861th percentile

    43 games · 3.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    1th percentile
  • 1986-8728th percentile

    44 games · 12.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    2th percentile
    Playmaking
    9th percentile
    Rebounding
    28th percentile
  • 1987-8811th percentile

    22 games · 5.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    11th percentile

Context

1987-88 · 22 games · 5.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 287 measured players in 1987-88 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1987-88 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.