Professional DNA

Tim Perry: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1995-96 · 30 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1995-96

The question

What kind of player is Tim Perry?

The evidence

Tim Perry · Defensive impact: 48th percentile (DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

48 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-2) · 361 players with a sample in 1995-96

Tim Perry: what moved most is Rebounding

55 percentilcompared against: 37 percentil (+18) · Tim Perry, from 1990-91 to 1991-92

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 8.5 minutes per game across 30 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 48th percentile
DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 361 players with a sample in 1995-96. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring4th percentile
2.4 points per game
Playmaking6th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact48th percentile
DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding14th percentile
1.6 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact48th percentile
Average · DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding14th percentile
Very low · 1.6 rebounds per game
Playmaking6th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Scoring4th percentile
Very low · 2.4 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 21th percentile → 4th percentile (-17) · Playmaking: 17th percentile → 6th percentile (-11) · Rebounding: 37th percentile → 14th percentile (-23)

1990-9137th percentile
46 games · 12.8 minutes per game
Scoring
21th percentile
Playmaking
17th percentile
Rebounding
37th percentile
1991-9285th percentile
80 games · 31.0 minutes per game
Scoring
69th percentile
Playmaking
50th percentile
Rebounding
85th percentile
1992-9373th percentile
81 games · 26.0 minutes per game
Scoring
56th percentile
Playmaking
47th percentile
Rebounding
73th percentile
1993-9475th percentile
80 games · 29.2 minutes per game
Scoring
55th percentile
Playmaking
38th percentile
Rebounding
75th percentile
1994-9528th percentile
42 games · 10.6 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
4th percentile
Rebounding
28th percentile
1995-9614th percentile
30 games · 8.5 minutes per game
Scoring
4th percentile
Playmaking
6th percentile
Rebounding
14th percentile

Context

1995-96 · 30 games · 8.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 361 measured players in 1995-96 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1995-96 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.