SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Don MacLean: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 8 games

96

percentil

Don MacLean
Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is Don MacLean?

The evidence

Don MacLean · Defensive impact: 96th percentile (DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

96 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+46) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

Don MacLean: what moved most is Scoring

34 percentilcompared against: 44 percentil (-10) · Don MacLean, from 1995-96 to 1998-99

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 9.5 minutes per game across 8 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 96th percentile

    DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring20th percentile

    3.9 points per game

  • Playmaking14th percentile

    0.5 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact96th percentile

    DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding29th percentile

    2.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact96th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Rebounding29th percentile

    Low · 2.3 rebounds per game

  • Scoring20th percentile

    Very low · 3.9 points per game

  • Playmaking14th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 65th percentile → 20th percentile (-45) · Playmaking: 51th percentile → 14th percentile (-37) · Rebounding: 58th percentile → 29th percentile (-29)

  • 1995-9665th percentile

    56 games · 19.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    65th percentile
    Playmaking
    51th percentile
    Rebounding
    58th percentile
  • 1996-9767th percentile

    37 games · 19.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    67th percentile
    Playmaking
    37th percentile
    Rebounding
    59th percentile
  • 1997-980th percentile

    9 games · 4.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile
  • 1998-9971th percentile

    17 games · 21.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    71th percentile
    Playmaking
    32th percentile
    Rebounding
    59th percentile
  • 1999-0010th percentile

    16 games · 8.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    10th percentile
    Playmaking
    13th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile
  • 2000-0120th percentile

    8 games · 9.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    14th percentile
    Rebounding
    29th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 8 games · 9.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.