SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Mark Bryant: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2002-03 · 16 games

9

percentil

Mark Bryant
Confidence: lowData through: 2002-03

The question

What kind of player is Mark Bryant?

The evidence

Mark Bryant · Defensive impact: 9th percentile (DBPM -1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

9 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-41) · 363 players with a sample in 2002-03

Mark Bryant: what moved most is Rebounding

9 percentilcompared against: 65 percentil (-56) · Mark Bryant, from 1997-98 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 6.3 minutes per game across 16 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 9th percentile

    DBPM -1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 363 players with a sample in 2002-03. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    0.8 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact9th percentile

    DBPM -1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    1.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact9th percentile

    Very low · DBPM -1.5: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 0.8 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 26th percentile → 0th percentile (-26) · Playmaking: 20th percentile → 5th percentile (-15) · Rebounding: 55th percentile → 8th percentile (-47)

  • 1997-9855th percentile

    70 games · 15.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    26th percentile
    Playmaking
    20th percentile
    Rebounding
    55th percentile
  • 1998-9973th percentile

    45 games · 26.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    38th percentile
    Rebounding
    73th percentile
  • 1999-0067th percentile

    75 games · 22.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    34th percentile
    Playmaking
    24th percentile
    Rebounding
    67th percentile
  • 2000-016th percentile

    18 games · 5.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    6th percentile
  • 2001-0212th percentile

    30 games · 6.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile
  • 2002-038th percentile

    16 games · 6.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile

Context

2002-03 · 16 games · 6.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 363 measured players in 2002-03 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2002-03 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-14

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.