SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Mark Hendrickson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1999-00 · 15 games

84

percentil

Mark Hendrickson
Confidence: lowData through: 1999-00

The question

What kind of player is Mark Hendrickson?

The evidence

Mark Hendrickson · Defensive impact: 84th percentile (DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

84 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+34) · 379 players with a sample in 1999-00

Mark Hendrickson: what moved most is Rebounding

2 percentilcompared against: 47 percentil (-45) · Mark Hendrickson, from 1996-97 to 1999-00

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 4.7 minutes per game across 15 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 84th percentile

    DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 379 players with a sample in 1999-00. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring1th percentile

    0.9 points per game

  • Playmaking10th percentile

    0.4 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact84th percentile

    DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding2th percentile

    0.9 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact84th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking10th percentile

    Very low · 0.4 assists per game

  • Rebounding2th percentile

    Very low · 0.9 rebounds per game

  • Scoring1th percentile

    Very low · 0.9 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 12th percentile → 1th percentile (-11) · Playmaking: 1th percentile → 10th percentile (+9) · Rebounding: 51th percentile → 2th percentile (-49)

  • 1996-9751th percentile

    29 games · 10.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    12th percentile
    Playmaking
    1th percentile
    Rebounding
    51th percentile
  • 1997-9845th percentile

    48 games · 15.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    17th percentile
    Playmaking
    28th percentile
    Rebounding
    45th percentile
  • 1998-9945th percentile

    22 games · 18.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    19th percentile
    Rebounding
    45th percentile
  • 1999-002th percentile

    15 games · 4.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    2th percentile

Context

1999-00 · 15 games · 4.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 379 measured players in 1999-00 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1999-00 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.