SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Nick Anderson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2001-02 · 15 games

32

percentil

Nick Anderson
Confidence: lowData through: 2001-02

The question

What kind of player is Nick Anderson?

The evidence

Nick Anderson · Defensive impact: 32th percentile (DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

32 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-18) · 380 players with a sample in 2001-02

Nick Anderson: what moved most is Scoring

13 percentilcompared against: 78 percentil (-65) · Nick Anderson, from 1996-97 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 14.6 minutes per game across 15 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 32th percentile

    DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 380 players with a sample in 2001-02. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring22th percentile

    4.0 points per game

  • Playmaking31th percentile

    0.9 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact32th percentile

    DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding27th percentile

    2.2 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact32th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.6: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking31th percentile

    Low · 0.9 assists per game

  • Rebounding27th percentile

    Low · 2.2 rebounds per game

  • Scoring22th percentile

    Very low · 4.0 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 70th percentile → 22th percentile (-48) · Playmaking: 77th percentile → 31th percentile (-46) · Rebounding: 72th percentile → 27th percentile (-45)

  • 1996-9770th percentile

    63 games · 34.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    70th percentile
    Playmaking
    77th percentile
    Rebounding
    72th percentile
  • 1997-9885th percentile

    58 games · 29.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    85th percentile
    Playmaking
    60th percentile
    Rebounding
    74th percentile
  • 1998-9986th percentile

    47 games · 33.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    86th percentile
    Playmaking
    63th percentile
    Rebounding
    79th percentile
  • 1999-0069th percentile

    72 games · 29.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    69th percentile
    Playmaking
    54th percentile
    Rebounding
    67th percentile
  • 2000-013th percentile

    21 games · 8.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    20th percentile
    Rebounding
    6th percentile
  • 2001-0222th percentile

    15 games · 14.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    22th percentile
    Playmaking
    31th percentile
    Rebounding
    27th percentile

Context

2001-02 · 15 games · 14.6 minutes per game · Percentile against 380 measured players in 2001-02 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2001-02 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.