SportiveWorld

What if…?

Without Cameron Johnson, Denver Nuggets were 9.0 points per game worse

54 games with him · 26 without, in 2025-26

-9.0

points per game

Cameron Johnson
Confidence: lowData through: 2025-26

The question

What would have changed if Cameron Johnson had not played?

The evidence

Without Cameron Johnson, Denver Nuggets were 9.0 points per game worse

-1.19 points per gamecompared against: 7.83 points per game (-9.02 · -115 %) · With Cameron Johnson in the box score

The fact

What actually happened, game by game, in 2025-26. None of this is an estimate.

With Cameron Johnson in the box score

+7.83 points per game

54 games · 37-17 · 125.4 – 117.6

Without him

-1.19 points per game

26 games · 15-11 · 114.8 – 116.0

The assumptions

What we decided in order to answer. If an assumption does not hold for you, neither does the answer.

  • That the 26 games without him represent a whole season without him.
  • That opponent quality is spread evenly across both groups. We have not controlled for it.
  • That other absences do not systematically coincide with his.

The estimated result

Arithmetic on the two figures above, nothing else: the per-game difference carried over a 82-game season.

  • points of margin per game-9.02
  • Across 82 games that is -740 points of accumulated margin.

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • This does not say he is the cause. A team without its best player also changes rotation, opponent and schedule at the same time.
  • It rests on 26 games without him. At that sample size, a couple of odd games move the number.
  • It is not a forecast for next season: it is what happened in the one already played.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

2026-04-08

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Box scores · closed season · its clock is the seasonGame results · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.