SportiveWorld

What if…?

Without Jacob Toppin, Atlanta Hawks were 1.8 points per game worse

5 games with him · 12 without, in 2025-26

-1.8

points per game

Jacob Toppin
Confidence: lowData through: 2025-26

The question

What would have changed if Jacob Toppin had not played?

The evidence

Without Jacob Toppin, Atlanta Hawks were 1.8 points per game worse

2.42 points per gamecompared against: 4.20 points per game (-1.78 · -42 %) · With Jacob Toppin in the box score

The fact

What actually happened, game by game, in 2025-26. None of this is an estimate.

With Jacob Toppin in the box score

+4.20 points per game

5 games · 3-2 · 115.6 – 111.4

Without him

+2.42 points per game

12 games · 7-5 · 118.2 – 115.8

The assumptions

What we decided in order to answer. If an assumption does not hold for you, neither does the answer.

  • That the 12 games without him represent a whole season without him.
  • That opponent quality is spread evenly across both groups. We have not controlled for it.
  • That other absences do not systematically coincide with his.

The estimated result

Arithmetic on the two figures above, nothing else: the per-game difference carried over a 82-game season.

  • points of margin per game-1.78
  • Across 82 games that is -146 points of accumulated margin.

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • This does not say he is the cause. A team without its best player also changes rotation, opponent and schedule at the same time.
  • It rests on 12 games without him. At that sample size, a couple of odd games move the number.
  • It is not a forecast for next season: it is what happened in the one already played.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

2025-11-25

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-10-12

Where this comes from

Box scores · closed season · its clock is the seasonGame results · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.