Professional DNA

Herb Williams: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1998-99 · 6 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1998-99

The question

What kind of player is Herb Williams?

The evidence

Herb Williams · Defensive impact: 16th percentile (DBPM -1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

16 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-34) · 337 players with a sample in 1998-99

Herb Williams: what moved most is Rebounding

12 percentilcompared against: 35 percentil (-23) · Herb Williams, from 1993-94 to 1995-96

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 5.7 minutes per game across 6 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 16th percentile
DBPM -1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 337 players with a sample in 1998-99. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring2th percentile
1.7 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.0 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact16th percentile
DBPM -1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding3th percentile
1.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact16th percentile
Very low · DBPM -1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding3th percentile
Very low · 1.0 rebounds per game
Scoring2th percentile
Very low · 1.7 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 15th percentile → 2th percentile (-13) · Playmaking: 8th percentile → 0th percentile (-8) · Rebounding: 35th percentile → 3th percentile (-32)

1993-9435th percentile
70 games · 11.1 minutes per game
Scoring
15th percentile
Playmaking
8th percentile
Rebounding
35th percentile
1994-9535th percentile
56 games · 13.3 minutes per game
Scoring
12th percentile
Playmaking
11th percentile
Rebounding
35th percentile
1995-9624th percentile
44 games · 13.0 minutes per game
Scoring
11th percentile
Playmaking
16th percentile
Rebounding
24th percentile
1996-9714th percentile
21 games · 8.8 minutes per game
Scoring
6th percentile
Playmaking
2th percentile
Rebounding
14th percentile
1997-987th percentile
27 games · 6.6 minutes per game
Scoring
1th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
7th percentile
1998-993th percentile
6 games · 5.7 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
3th percentile

Context

1998-99 · 6 games · 5.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 337 measured players in 1998-99 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1998-99 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.