SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Amal McCaskill: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2003-04 · 59 games

63

percentil

Amal McCaskill
Confidence: lowData through: 2003-04

The question

What kind of player is Amal McCaskill?

The evidence

Amal McCaskill · Defensive impact: 63th percentile (DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

63 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+13) · 372 players with a sample in 2003-04

Amal McCaskill: what moved most is Rebounding

23 percentilcompared against: 10 percentil (+13) · Amal McCaskill, from 1996-97 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 10.8 minutes per game across 59 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 63th percentile

    DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 372 players with a sample in 2003-04. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring3th percentile

    1.9 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact63th percentile

    DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rim22th percentile

    52.6 % · 57 attempts

  • Rebounding27th percentile

    2.3 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Rebounding27th percentile

    Low · 2.3 rebounds per game

  • Finishing at the rim22th percentile

    Very low · 52.6 % · 57 attempts

  • Scoring3th percentile

    Very low · 1.9 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 3th percentile → 3th percentile (0) · Playmaking: 10th percentile → 3th percentile (-7) · Rebounding: 10th percentile → 27th percentile (+17)

  • 1996-9710th percentile

    17 games · 6.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    10th percentile
    Rebounding
    10th percentile
  • 2001-029th percentile

    27 games · 5.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    9th percentile
  • 2002-0318th percentile

    11 games · 6.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    13th percentile
    Rebounding
    18th percentile
  • 2003-0427th percentile

    59 games · 10.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    3th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    27th percentile

Context

2003-04 · 59 games · 10.8 minutes per game · Percentile against 372 measured players in 2003-04 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2003-04 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.