Professional DNA

Tom Chambers: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1997-98 · 1 games

100

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 1997-98

The question

What kind of player is Tom Chambers?

The evidence

Tom Chambers · Defensive impact: 100th percentile (DBPM 9.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

100 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+50) · 370 players with a sample in 1997-98

Tom Chambers: what moved most is Playmaking

3 percentilcompared against: 40 percentil (-37) · Tom Chambers, from 1991-92 to 1996-97

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 10.0 minutes per game across 1 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 100th percentile
DBPM 9.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 370 players with a sample in 1997-98. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring38th percentile
6.0 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.0 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact100th percentile
DBPM 9.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding25th percentile
2.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact100th percentile
Elite · DBPM 9.3: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring38th percentile
Low · 6.0 points per game
Rebounding25th percentile
Low · 2.0 rebounds per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 83th percentile → 38th percentile (-45) · Playmaking: 58th percentile → 0th percentile (-58) · Rebounding: 77th percentile → 25th percentile (-52)

1991-9258th percentile
69 games · 28.2 minutes per game
Scoring
83th percentile
Playmaking
58th percentile
Rebounding
77th percentile
1992-9341th percentile
73 games · 23.6 minutes per game
Scoring
68th percentile
Playmaking
41th percentile
Rebounding
70th percentile
1993-9431th percentile
80 games · 23.0 minutes per game
Scoring
66th percentile
Playmaking
31th percentile
Rebounding
62th percentile
1994-9531th percentile
81 games · 15.3 minutes per game
Scoring
38th percentile
Playmaking
31th percentile
Rebounding
39th percentile
1996-975th percentile
12 games · 6.9 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
9th percentile
1997-980th percentile
1 games · 10.0 minutes per game
Scoring
38th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
25th percentile

Context

1997-98 · 1 games · 10.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 370 measured players in 1997-98 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 1997-98 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.