Professional DNA

Kelvin Cato: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2006-07 · 18 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2006-07

The question

What kind of player is Kelvin Cato?

The evidence

Kelvin Cato · Defensive impact: 77th percentile (DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

77 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+27) · 396 players with a sample in 2006-07

Kelvin Cato: what moved most is Rebounding

29 percentilcompared against: 85 percentil (-56) · Kelvin Cato, from 2001-02 to 2005-06

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 5.3 minutes per game across 18 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 77th percentile
DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 396 players with a sample in 2006-07. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring2th percentile
1.2 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.0 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact77th percentile
DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding18th percentile
1.7 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact77th percentile
Very high · DBPM 0.9: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Rebounding18th percentile
Very low · 1.7 rebounds per game
Scoring2th percentile
Very low · 1.2 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 44th percentile → 2th percentile (-42) · Playmaking: 11th percentile → 0th percentile (-11) · Rebounding: 88th percentile → 18th percentile (-70)

2001-0288th percentile
75 games · 25.6 minutes per game
Scoring
44th percentile
Playmaking
11th percentile
Rebounding
88th percentile
2002-0379th percentile
73 games · 17.1 minutes per game
Scoring
25th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
79th percentile
2003-0487th percentile
69 games · 25.3 minutes per game
Scoring
42th percentile
Playmaking
36th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
2004-0586th percentile
62 games · 24.6 minutes per game
Scoring
46th percentile
Playmaking
19th percentile
Rebounding
86th percentile
2005-0639th percentile
27 games · 12.3 minutes per game
Scoring
24th percentile
Playmaking
1th percentile
Rebounding
39th percentile
2006-0718th percentile
18 games · 5.3 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
18th percentile

Context

2006-07 · 18 games · 5.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 396 measured players in 2006-07 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2006-07 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-08

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.