SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Michael Dickerson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2002-03 · 6 games

83

percentil

Michael Dickerson
Confidence: lowData through: 2002-03

The question

What kind of player is Michael Dickerson?

The evidence

Michael Dickerson · Defensive impact: 83th percentile (DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

83 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+33) · 363 players with a sample in 2002-03

Michael Dickerson: what moved most is Scoring

29 percentilcompared against: 80 percentil (-51) · Michael Dickerson, from 1998-99 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 14.5 minutes per game across 6 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 363 players with a sample in 2002-03. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring29th percentile

    4.8 points per game

  • Playmaking43th percentile

    1.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding4th percentile

    1.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Playmaking43th percentile

    Average · 1.3 assists per game

  • Scoring29th percentile

    Low · 4.8 points per game

  • Rebounding4th percentile

    Very low · 1.0 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 71th percentile → 29th percentile (-42) · Playmaking: 63th percentile → 43th percentile (-20) · Rebounding: 13th percentile → 4th percentile (-9)

  • 1998-9971th percentile

    50 games · 31.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    71th percentile
    Playmaking
    63th percentile
    Rebounding
    13th percentile
  • 1999-0092th percentile

    82 games · 37.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    92th percentile
    Playmaking
    70th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 2000-0188th percentile

    70 games · 37.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    88th percentile
    Playmaking
    81th percentile
    Rebounding
    47th percentile
  • 2001-0269th percentile

    4 games · 31.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    69th percentile
    Playmaking
    69th percentile
    Rebounding
    39th percentile
  • 2002-0329th percentile

    6 games · 14.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    43th percentile
    Rebounding
    4th percentile

Context

2002-03 · 6 games · 14.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 363 measured players in 2002-03 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2002-03 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.