Professional DNA

Olden Polynice: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2003-04 · 2 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2003-04

The question

What kind of player is Olden Polynice?

The evidence

Olden Polynice · Defensive impact: 91th percentile (DBPM 1.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

91 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+41) · 373 players with a sample in 2003-04

Olden Polynice: what moved most is Rebounding

3 percentilcompared against: 83 percentil (-80) · Olden Polynice, from 1996-97 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 6.0 minutes per game across 2 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 91th percentile
DBPM 1.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 373 players with a sample in 2003-04. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring0th percentile
0.0 points per game
Playmaking14th percentile
0.5 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact91th percentile
DBPM 1.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding3th percentile
1.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact91th percentile
Elite · DBPM 1.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Playmaking14th percentile
Very low · 0.5 assists per game
Rebounding3th percentile
Very low · 1.0 rebounds per game
Scoring0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 points per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 72th percentile → 0th percentile (-72) · Playmaking: 65th percentile → 14th percentile (-51) · Rebounding: 94th percentile → 3th percentile (-91)

1996-9794th percentile
82 games · 35.3 minutes per game
Scoring
72th percentile
Playmaking
65th percentile
Rebounding
94th percentile
1997-9882th percentile
70 games · 20.8 minutes per game
Scoring
52th percentile
Playmaking
51th percentile
Rebounding
82th percentile
1998-9994th percentile
48 games · 30.9 minutes per game
Scoring
49th percentile
Playmaking
32th percentile
Rebounding
94th percentile
1999-0076th percentile
82 games · 22.2 minutes per game
Scoring
30th percentile
Playmaking
13th percentile
Rebounding
76th percentile
2000-0171th percentile
81 games · 20.0 minutes per game
Scoring
36th percentile
Playmaking
11th percentile
Rebounding
71th percentile
2003-043th percentile
2 games · 6.0 minutes per game
Scoring
0th percentile
Playmaking
14th percentile
Rebounding
3th percentile

Context

2003-04 · 2 games · 6.0 minutes per game · Percentile against 373 measured players in 2003-04 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2003-04 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-08

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.