Professional DNA

Scott Burrell: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 4 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is Scott Burrell?

The evidence

Scott Burrell · Defensive impact: 96th percentile (DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

96 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+46) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

Scott Burrell: what moved most is Rebounding

2 percentilcompared against: 52 percentil (-50) · Scott Burrell, from 1995-96 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 10.3 minutes per game across 4 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 96th percentile
DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring23th percentile
4.3 points per game
Playmaking5th percentile
0.3 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact96th percentile
DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding2th percentile
0.8 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact96th percentile
Elite · DBPM 2.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Scoring23th percentile
Very low · 4.3 points per game
Playmaking5th percentile
Very low · 0.3 assists per game
Rebounding2th percentile
Very low · 0.8 rebounds per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 76th percentile → 23th percentile (-53) · Playmaking: 66th percentile → 5th percentile (-61) · Rebounding: 74th percentile → 2th percentile (-72)

1995-9674th percentile
20 games · 34.7 minutes per game
Scoring
76th percentile
Playmaking
66th percentile
Rebounding
74th percentile
1996-9743th percentile
57 games · 16.5 minutes per game
Scoring
35th percentile
Playmaking
45th percentile
Rebounding
43th percentile
1997-9837th percentile
80 games · 13.7 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
26th percentile
Rebounding
37th percentile
1998-9957th percentile
32 games · 22.1 minutes per game
Scoring
41th percentile
Playmaking
49th percentile
Rebounding
57th percentile
1999-0051th percentile
74 games · 18.1 minutes per game
Scoring
37th percentile
Playmaking
33th percentile
Rebounding
51th percentile
2000-012th percentile
4 games · 10.3 minutes per game
Scoring
23th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
2th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 4 games · 10.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.