SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Gary Grant: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 4 games

60

percentil

Gary Grant
Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is Gary Grant?

The evidence

Gary Grant · Defensive impact: 60th percentile (DBPM 0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

60 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+10) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

Gary Grant: what moved most is Playmaking

6 percentilcompared against: 59 percentil (-53) · Gary Grant, from 1995-96 to 1999-00

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 4.3 minutes per game across 4 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 60th percentile

    DBPM 0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring9th percentile

    2.5 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact60th percentile

    DBPM 0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.0 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Scoring9th percentile

    Very low · 2.5 points per game

  • Playmaking5th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 29th percentile → 9th percentile (-20) · Playmaking: 48th percentile → 5th percentile (-43) · Rebounding: 6th percentile → 0th percentile (-6)

  • 1995-9648th percentile

    47 games · 12.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    48th percentile
    Rebounding
    6th percentile
  • 1996-9752th percentile

    28 games · 13.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    23th percentile
    Playmaking
    52th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile
  • 1997-9886th percentile

    22 games · 16.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    30th percentile
    Playmaking
    86th percentile
    Rebounding
    29th percentile
  • 1998-9951th percentile

    2 games · 3.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    51th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile
  • 1999-007th percentile

    3 games · 8.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    20th percentile
    Playmaking
    7th percentile
    Rebounding
    3th percentile
  • 2000-015th percentile

    4 games · 4.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    5th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 4 games · 4.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.