Professional DNA

James Robinson: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 6 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is James Robinson?

The evidence

James Robinson · Defensive impact: 96th percentile (DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

96 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+46) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

James Robinson: what moved most is Playmaking

0 percentilcompared against: 59 percentil (-59) · James Robinson, from 1994-95 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 8.3 minutes per game across 6 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 96th percentile
DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring3th percentile
1.7 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.0 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact96th percentile
DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding9th percentile
1.3 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact96th percentile
Elite · DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Rebounding9th percentile
Very low · 1.3 rebounds per game
Scoring3th percentile
Very low · 1.7 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.0 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 55th percentile → 3th percentile (-52) · Playmaking: 67th percentile → 0th percentile (-67) · Rebounding: 22th percentile → 9th percentile (-13)

1994-9567th percentile
71 games · 21.7 minutes per game
Scoring
55th percentile
Playmaking
67th percentile
Rebounding
22th percentile
1995-9659th percentile
76 games · 21.4 minutes per game
Scoring
51th percentile
Playmaking
59th percentile
Rebounding
25th percentile
1996-9756th percentile
69 games · 19.0 minutes per game
Scoring
56th percentile
Playmaking
56th percentile
Rebounding
17th percentile
1997-9856th percentile
70 games · 17.6 minutes per game
Scoring
50th percentile
Playmaking
56th percentile
Rebounding
17th percentile
1998-9959th percentile
31 games · 16.3 minutes per game
Scoring
35th percentile
Playmaking
59th percentile
Rebounding
19th percentile
2000-010th percentile
6 games · 8.3 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
9th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 6 games · 8.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.