SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Travis Best: ALL-AROUND

Defensive impact · 2004-05 · 76 games

77

percentil

Travis Best
Confidence: lowData through: 2004-05

The question

What kind of player is Travis Best?

The evidence

Travis Best · Defensive impact: 77th percentile (DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

77 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+27) · 388 players with a sample in 2004-05

Travis Best: what moved most is Playmaking

59 percentilcompared against: 87 percentil (-28) · Travis Best, from 1999-00 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they areALL-AROUND
  • RoleShort rotation: 19.2 minutes per game across 76 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 77th percentile

    DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 388 players with a sample in 2004-05. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring45th percentile

    6.8 points per game

  • Playmaking60th percentile

    1.9 assists per game

  • Outside shooting60th percentile
  • Defensive impact77th percentile

    DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rim37th percentile

    55.3 % · 114 attempts

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    1.4 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact77th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring45th percentile

    Average · 6.8 points per game

  • Finishing at the rim37th percentile

    Low · 55.3 % · 114 attempts

  • Rebounding8th percentile

    Very low · 1.4 rebounds per game

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 62th percentile → 45th percentile (-17) · Playmaking: 81th percentile → 60th percentile (-21) · Rebounding: 17th percentile → 8th percentile (-9)

  • 1999-0081th percentile

    82 games · 20.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    62th percentile
    Playmaking
    81th percentile
    Rebounding
    17th percentile
  • 2000-0195th percentile

    77 games · 31.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    76th percentile
    Playmaking
    95th percentile
    Rebounding
    40th percentile
  • 2001-0289th percentile

    74 games · 23.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    54th percentile
    Playmaking
    89th percentile
    Rebounding
    22th percentile
  • 2002-0383th percentile

    72 games · 25.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    58th percentile
    Playmaking
    83th percentile
    Rebounding
    18th percentile
  • 2003-0457th percentile

    61 games · 12.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    57th percentile
    Rebounding
    4th percentile
  • 2004-0560th percentile

    76 games · 19.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    45th percentile
    Playmaking
    60th percentile
    Rebounding
    8th percentile

Context

2004-05 · 76 games · 19.2 minutes per game · Percentile against 388 measured players in 2004-05 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2004-05 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.