SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Lester Conner: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1994-95 · 2 games

100

percentil

Lester Conner
Confidence: lowData through: 1994-95

The question

What kind of player is Lester Conner?

The evidence

Lester Conner · Defensive impact: 100th percentile (DBPM 12.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

100 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+50) · 349 players with a sample in 1994-95

Lester Conner: what moved most is Playmaking

0 percentilcompared against: 72 percentil (-72) · Lester Conner, from 1989-90 to 1994-95

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 2.5 minutes per game across 2 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 100th percentile

    DBPM 12.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 349 players with a sample in 1994-95. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring0th percentile

    1.0 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    0.0 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    DBPM 12.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.0 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact100th percentile

    Elite · DBPM 12.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring0th percentile

    Very low · 1.0 points per game

  • Playmaking0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 assists per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.0 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 46th percentile → 0th percentile (-46) · Playmaking: 88th percentile → 0th percentile (-88) · Rebounding: 49th percentile → 0th percentile (-49)

  • 1989-9088th percentile

    82 games · 28.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    46th percentile
    Playmaking
    88th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 1990-9161th percentile

    74 games · 13.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    14th percentile
    Playmaking
    61th percentile
    Rebounding
    14th percentile
  • 1991-9282th percentile

    81 games · 17.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    17th percentile
    Playmaking
    82th percentile
    Rebounding
    30th percentile
  • 1992-9358th percentile

    31 games · 13.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    7th percentile
    Playmaking
    58th percentile
    Rebounding
    15th percentile
  • 1993-9472th percentile

    11 games · 15.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    72th percentile
    Rebounding
    26th percentile
  • 1994-950th percentile

    2 games · 2.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    0th percentile
    Playmaking
    0th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

1994-95 · 2 games · 2.5 minutes per game · Percentile against 349 measured players in 1994-95 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1994-95 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.