SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Tim Hardaway: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2002-03 · 10 games

83

percentil

Tim Hardaway
Confidence: lowData through: 2002-03

The question

What kind of player is Tim Hardaway?

The evidence

Tim Hardaway · Defensive impact: 83th percentile (DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

83 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+33) · 363 players with a sample in 2002-03

Tim Hardaway: what moved most is Scoring

30 percentilcompared against: 83 percentil (-53) · Tim Hardaway, from 1997-98 to 2002-03

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 12.7 minutes per game across 10 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 363 players with a sample in 2002-03. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring30th percentile

    4.9 points per game

  • Playmaking67th percentile

    2.4 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding10th percentile

    1.5 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact83th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring30th percentile

    Low · 4.9 points per game

  • Rebounding10th percentile

    Very low · 1.5 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 93th percentile → 30th percentile (-63) · Playmaking: 98th percentile → 67th percentile (-31) · Rebounding: 58th percentile → 10th percentile (-48)

  • 1997-9893th percentile

    81 games · 37.4 minutes per game

    Scoring
    93th percentile
    Playmaking
    98th percentile
    Rebounding
    58th percentile
  • 1998-9992th percentile

    48 games · 36.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    92th percentile
    Playmaking
    97th percentile
    Rebounding
    47th percentile
  • 1999-0081th percentile

    52 games · 32.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    81th percentile
    Playmaking
    97th percentile
    Rebounding
    40th percentile
  • 2000-0185th percentile

    77 games · 33.9 minutes per game

    Scoring
    85th percentile
    Playmaking
    96th percentile
    Rebounding
    33th percentile
  • 2001-0265th percentile

    68 games · 23.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    65th percentile
    Playmaking
    87th percentile
    Rebounding
    18th percentile
  • 2002-0330th percentile

    10 games · 12.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    30th percentile
    Playmaking
    67th percentile
    Rebounding
    10th percentile

Context

2002-03 · 10 games · 12.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 363 measured players in 2002-03 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2002-03 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.