SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Bimbo Coles: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2003-04 · 22 games

26

percentil

Bimbo Coles
Confidence: lowData through: 2003-04

The question

What kind of player is Bimbo Coles?

The evidence

Bimbo Coles · Defensive impact: 26th percentile (DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

26 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-24) · 372 players with a sample in 2003-04

Bimbo Coles: what moved most is Playmaking

23 percentilcompared against: 77 percentil (-54) · Bimbo Coles, from 1998-99 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 7.7 minutes per game across 22 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 26th percentile

    DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 372 players with a sample in 2003-04. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring1th percentile

    1.3 points per game

  • Playmaking23th percentile

    0.7 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact26th percentile

    DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    0.5 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact26th percentile

    Low · DBPM -0.7: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking23th percentile

    Very low · 0.7 assists per game

  • Scoring1th percentile

    Very low · 1.3 points per game

  • Rebounding0th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 rebounds per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 63th percentile → 1th percentile (-62) · Playmaking: 91th percentile → 23th percentile (-68) · Rebounding: 30th percentile → 0th percentile (-30)

  • 1998-9991th percentile

    48 games · 26.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    63th percentile
    Playmaking
    91th percentile
    Rebounding
    30th percentile
  • 1999-0084th percentile

    80 games · 24.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    56th percentile
    Playmaking
    84th percentile
    Rebounding
    28th percentile
  • 2000-0175th percentile

    47 games · 17.1 minutes per game

    Scoring
    32th percentile
    Playmaking
    75th percentile
    Rebounding
    4th percentile
  • 2001-0269th percentile

    47 games · 14.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    69th percentile
    Rebounding
    7th percentile
  • 2002-0365th percentile

    35 games · 19.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    23th percentile
    Playmaking
    65th percentile
    Rebounding
    13th percentile
  • 2003-0423th percentile

    22 games · 7.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    1th percentile
    Playmaking
    23th percentile
    Rebounding
    0th percentile

Context

2003-04 · 22 games · 7.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 372 measured players in 2003-04 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2003-04 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.