Motiejus Krivas
Arizona Wildcats · NCAA Division I · Center · Junior · 2.18 m
SportiveWorld evaluation
Main reading
His model rank rests on the environment (Arizona Wildcats); on his signals alone, #10 of 39.
Why he is here
The NCAA model places him #2 of 39: the bet is the environment (Arizona Wildcats, opponent +6.1), not individual dominance — on his signals alone he would be #10. The market has him 15 places lower (#17).
Measured over 39 games with a box score · 2025-26 · Arizona Wildcats
- fact81 % probability of an NBA career (≥ 2,000 min). On the model's scale: context +4.65 · player +1.69. With average opponent and team, the same profile would give 3.8 %; on the environment alone, 44 %.
- factMeasured environment: Arizona Wildcats, strength +16.8 (+2.5 sd) · average opponent +6.1 (+2.6 sd) — environment #4 of 39 ranked
- factHis individual signal adding the most: Blocks per 40 3.0 (+3.1 sd · contribution +1.17). On his individual signals alone he would be #10 of 39.
- factHistorical comparables: 17 of 79 similar university seasons reached the NBA (22 %) — #6 of 36 ranked in that lens. The model gives him 92 % to reach the NBA: the comparables are more conservative than the model for all 36 ranked, which is why this lens compares ranks, not figures.
interpretationThe position is a bet on having performed in one of the country's best environments: the model rewards surviving and producing against that schedule. What we do not know is how much of it travels with him to another team and another role.
Where the rank comes from: how much his individual signals contribute and how much his environment (model scale). Below, the probability with an average opponent and team, and the probability on the environment alone.
Potential
Categorical reading of the ceiling the accredited evidence supports. Not a score: it starts from the NCAA model (if any) or from the market prior and only moves one level with our own evidence, declared piece by piece.
factStarts from the NCAA model: 81% probability of an NBA career (#2 of 39 measured). → Elite
- ◎The market (#17) sees him two bands below the model: down one level.
- ◎On his individual signals alone he would be #10 of 39 (≥ 8 places worse than his model #2): his rank rests on the environment. Down one level.
Evidence moves the reading one level at most, in the direction the sum of the evidence pushes. · Confidence: NCAA season with ≥ 15 games with a box score and ≥ 60% of the team's games.
Production
2025-26 · Arizona Wildcats · 10.4p · 8.2r · 1.1a · 25.2 min · 39 of 39 games with a box score · TS 65.0 %
By opponent level ▾
Per 40 minutes, over the games with a box score. Small samples within one season: read as a hint, not a verdict.
| pj | W-L | min | pts/40 | reb/40 | ast/40 | tov/40 | TS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | 39 | — | 25.2 | 16.5 | 12.9 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 65.0 % |
| Opponents +8 or better | 13 | 12-1 | 26.8 | 12.4 | 12.1 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 55.9 % |
| Other opponents | 26 | 24-2 | 24.4 | 18.8 | 13.4 | 1.9 | 2.6 | 69.1 % |
| Postseason | 8 | 7-1 | 26.9 | 13.6 | 11.9 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 58.3 % |
| Away / neutral | 12 | 11-1 | 26.5 | 15.3 | 13.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 56.9 % |
Strengths
Signals that add the most
What travels: holds up against strong opponents
—
An individual signal is transferable if it holds against opponents rated +8 or better (≥ 90% of its season value). What evaporates as the level rises is stated.
Risks and what would change our mind
Signals that subtract
- ▼Trajectory: −2.0 pts/40 vs 2023-24
- ▼Junior: the model does not adjust for age or class; the same production from a freshman projects higher
Would make us move him down
- ▼The performance not travelling: without the Arizona Wildcats environment his signals leave him #10 of 39
- ▼Age: we do not adjust for it (Junior); the same production from a freshman projects higher
- ▼More sources consolidating the consensus #17
Would make us move him up
- ▲More scoring per 40 min: today 16.5 (+0.3 sd)
- ▲Combine measurements (wingspan, reach, athleticism): we do not have them today
- ▲The same performance in another context (another role, a team other than Arizona Wildcats): it would separate the player from his environment
What to watch until the Draft
- →The 2026-27 season: every new box score is measured and can move the rank
- →The 2027 Combine (May): wingspan, reach and athleticism we do not have today
- →The mocks: captured daily; today the consensus is 2 source(s)
- →His minutes (25.2 per game): a drop would show in the box score before any news
Context
Facts derived from the box score (Basketball-Reference formulas over the games he played) and the standings. No film or tracking data.
Context
Facts derived from the box score (Basketball-Reference formulas over the games he played) and the standings. No film or tracking data.
Role on his team
- ·Started 39 of 39 games (100%) · 25.2 min (63% of the available minutes)
- ·Usage 18.0% of his team's possessions while on the floor · 19% of its points
- ·Creation: assists 7.1% of his teammates' baskets while on the floor · 0.80 assists per turnover · 14.5% of his possessions end in a turnover
- ·Team record with him on the floor: 36-3 · estimated pace 71.1 possessions per 40 min
His team and schedule
- ·Arizona Wildcats · Big 12 Conference · 29-2 in the standings · 16-2 in conference
- ·Latest poll: Coaches Poll, week 21, #3 (36-3)
- ·Postseason with a box score: 8 games, 5 in the NCAA Tournament (up to Final Four)
- ·Team strength +16.8 (+2.5 sd in the cohort) · average opponent +6.1 (+2.6 sd): the model's two context signals
Development
Development
Versus 2023-24: −2.0 pts/40 · +2.5 % TS · +0.6 ast/40 · −0.9 reb/40 · +12.6 min · SW score +69 pp · 2024-25 skipped: 4 games with a box score
Comparables and outlook (Scout)
Similarity of one season's statistical profile (12 axes per 40 minutes), not of playing style. 'Looks like X' means 'his season resembles it on these axes', nothing more.
Comparables and outlook (Scout)
Similarity of one season's statistical profile (12 axes per 40 minutes), not of playing style. 'Looks like X' means 'his season resembles it on these axes', nothing more.
fact17 of the 79 university seasons most like his 2025-26 reached the NBA (22 %) · statistical archetype: Rim-protecting big
NBA twins · what they share
Computed on 2025-26 (39 games) · 2026-09-13
Combine
Combine
No Combine measurements: he does not appear in the 2024-2026 combines (or does not match uniquely by name). The physique above is what his programme lists, not a measurement.
Market vs SportiveWorld
Outside reference: the rank given by the cited publications. We know the rank; they do not publish the why.
factExternal consensus #17 (Tankathon #24 · nbadraftroom #9; 2 source(s)). What we know: the rank. What we do NOT know: why they place him there — the sources publish rankings, not reasons.
Does our position hold? · The three lenses
- ◎On his individual signals alone (average opponent and team) he would be #10 of 39: +8 places versus SW #2, with a 3.8 % probability
- ◎On his environment alone (opponent and team) he would be #4 of 39, with 44 %
- ◎The comparables lens places him in the same zone of the board: #6 of 36 versus SW #2. A relative rank, not a rate: 22 % of 79 similar seasons reached the NBA; the model gives him 92 % to reach it
Three independent lenses against our own place: his individual signals alone, his environment alone and the historical comparables. A lens disagrees when it lands 8 places away or more. SportiveWorld can be wrong: this is where it shows.
Conviction
- ✓Sample: 39 of 39 games with a box score (100%)
- ✓Standardised by the Scout census (own season profile)
- ✓Consensus from 2 sources
- ✗His individual signals alone place him far from the SW rank (#10 versus #2)
- ✓Historical comparables agree on the zone (#6 of 36 versus SW #2)
- ✓Trajectory in favour: +69 pp of probability versus 2023-24
Why this gap exists ▾
On our side the gap decomposes exactly: which dimensions push the rank up and which hold it back. On the consensus side we only see the rank: its sources publish rankings, not reasons, so why they place him there is UNKNOWN. All we can say is what our model does NOT measure.
factSportiveWorld #2 · consensus #17: 15 places higher. Pushing up: Opponent quality · Team strength · Box-score defence · Production. Holding back: Efficiency · Creation. Consensus sources: 2.
unknownWe know the consensus rank (#17: Tankathon #24 · nbadraftroom #9). We do not know why they place him there: the sources publish rankings, not reasons.
Pushes the rank up
Holds the rank back
What our model does NOT measure (it could explain part of the gap; the consensus does not publish its reasons)
- ◇Age and class (Junior): the model does not adjust for them and favours the productive veteran
- ◇Physique and athleticism: no Combine measurements; only the listed height
- ◇Projection, film and future role: not in the box score
No appreciable weight · Outside shooting −0.06 · Minutes −0.03
Rank history ▾
7 captures, from 2026-09-13 to 2026-09-20
Movement in the mocks
Data and evidence
Everything behind the reading, on demand: season signal by signal, trajectory, games with a box score, comparables, consensus and the provenance of every figure.
Data and evidence
Everything behind the reading, on demand: season signal by signal, trajectory, games with a box score, comparables, consensus and the provenance of every figure.
All the model's signals
Calibrated probability of an NBA career of ≥ 2,000 minutes, given this season = 80.7 % · P(playing in the NBA) = 91.5 %
39 of 39 games with a box score · 21 conference · Average opponent +6.1 (+2.6 sd vs the cohort) · team +16.8 (+2.5 sd) · standardization from the Scout census
Who he is
The games with a box score in the measured season
| 2025-26 | Opponent | opp. rating | min | pts | reb | ast | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-05 | Michigan Wolverines L 73-91 · Final Four | +17.8 | 28 | 11 | 6 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-03-29 | Purdue Boilermakers W 79-64 · NCAA Tournament | +11.1 | 35 | 6 | 12 | 3 | box score |
| 2026-03-27 | Arkansas Razorbacks W 109-88 · NCAA Tournament | +9.2 | 23 | 14 | 5 | 2 | box score |
| 2026-03-23 | Utah State Aggies W 78-66 · NCAA Tournament | +11.4 | 32 | 11 | 14 | 2 | box score |
| 2026-03-20 | Long Island University Sharks W 92-58 · NCAA Tournament | +1.9 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 2 | box score |
| 2026-03-14 | Houston Cougars W 79-74 · Conference Tournament | +14.5 | 25 | 6 | 6 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-03-13 | Iowa State Cyclones W 82-80 · Conference Tournament | +16.4 | 27 | 7 | 4 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-03-12 | UCF Knights W 81-59 · Conference Tournament | +2.3 | 23 | 9 | 10 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-03-08 | @ Colorado Buffaloes W 89-79 | +0.4 | 25 | 10 | 7 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-03-03 | Iowa State Cyclones W 73-57 | +16.4 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-02-28 | Kansas Jayhawks W 84-61 | +6.1 | 31 | 13 | 10 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-02-25 | @ Baylor Bears W 87-80 | +5.3 | 27 | 12 | 4 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-02-21 | @ Houston Cougars W 73-66 | +14.5 | 25 | 4 | 5 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-02-19 | BYU Cougars W 75-68 | +8.1 | 25 | 5 | 7 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-02-14 | Texas Tech Red Raiders L 75-78 | +7.2 | 38 | 10 | 11 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-02-10 | @ Kansas Jayhawks L 78-82 | +6.1 | 31 | 14 | 15 | 4 | box score |
| 2026-02-07 | Oklahoma State Cowboys W 84-47 | +0.7 | 21 | 10 | 9 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-01-31 | @ Arizona State Sun Devils W 87-74 | −2.0 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-01-27 | @ BYU Cougars W 86-83 | +8.1 | 21 | 2 | 8 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-01-24 | West Virginia Mountaineers W 88-53 | +4.9 | 23 | 11 | 12 | 3 | box score |
| 2026-01-22 | Cincinnati Bearcats W 77-51 | +5.5 | 30 | 17 | 9 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-01-17 | @ UCF Knights W 84-77 | +2.3 | 30 | 17 | 12 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-01-15 | Arizona State Sun Devils W 89-82 | −2.0 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 1 | box score |
| 2026-01-10 | @ TCU Horned Frogs W 86-73 | +5.3 | 27 | 8 | 10 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-01-08 | Kansas State Wildcats W 101-76 | −2.3 | 29 | 25 | 12 | 0 | box score |
| 2026-01-03 | @ Utah Utes W 97-78 | −4.7 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 0 | box score |
| 2025-12-30 | South Dakota State Jackrabbits W 99-71 | +2.6 | 23 | 13 | 11 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-12-23 | Bethune-Cookman Wildcats W 107-71 | −1.6 | 18 | 14 | 5 | 0 | box score |
| 2025-12-21 | San Diego State Aztecs W 68-45 | +7.2 | 25 | 3 | 13 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-12-17 | Abilene Christian Wildcats W 96-62 | −2.1 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-12-14 | @ Alabama Crimson Tide W 96-75 | +8.5 | 29 | 14 | 14 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-12-07 | Auburn Tigers W 97-68 | +4.2 | 23 | 8 | 9 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-11-29 | Norfolk State Spartans W 98-61 | +2.6 | 26 | 20 | 9 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-11-25 | Denver Pioneers W 103-73 | 0.0 | 17 | 7 | 4 | 3 | box score |
| 2025-11-20 | @ UConn Huskies W 71-67 | +11.4 | 29 | 9 | 14 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-11-15 | @ UCLA Bruins W 69-65 | +6.0 | 34 | 10 | 8 | 3 | box score |
| 2025-11-12 | Northern Arizona Lumberjacks W 84-49 | −5.1 | 17 | 12 | 7 | 1 | box score |
| 2025-11-08 | Utah Tech Trailblazers W 93-67 | +1.9 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 2 | box score |
| 2025-11-04 | Florida Gators W 93-87 | +15.6 | 26 | 6 | 8 | 1 | box score |
Evidence and provenance
Every figure in this file comes from one of these sources, with its scope and its sample. What is not here has not been measured.
| Owner | Scope | Sample | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Outside consensus | draft_board_mock · lib/bigboard.ts | 2 mocks | Tankathon #24 · nbadraftroom #9 |
| Identity | draft_board_prospect.espn_athlete_id · scripts/cross_bigboard_stats.mjs | NCAA Division I | 5174954 |
| Season | ncaa_player_box + ncaa_game · lib/scout/ejes.mjs | NCAA 2025-26 · Arizona Wildcats | 39 of 39 games with a box score |
| Opponent quality | lib/draft/sql_rival.mjs (ncaa_game, ≥10 pj) | NCAA 2025-26 | 39 / 39 |
| z | ncaa_season_profile (scripts/scout_perfil_ncaa.mjs) | NCAA 2025-26 | standardization from the Scout census |
| SW rank | lib/draft/modelo.ts · lib/draft/calibracion.json | 2005-2021 | n=26,550 · AUC 0.897 |
| The player within his team | ncaa_player_box (rolDe · fórmulas B-R) | NCAA 2025-26 | 39 pj |
| The team | ncaa_standings · ncaa_ranking · ncaa_game | NCAA 2025-26 | Big 12 Conference |
| Comparables and outlook (Scout) | scout_nba_outlook (scripts/scout_outlook.mjs) | NCAA 2025-26 | 39 pj · 2026-09-13 |
| Physical | ncaa_player (ESPN, 2026) | NCAA 2025-26 | 218 cm · 118 kg |
| Rank history | draft_sw_board_snapshot · draft_board_mock_snapshot (mig 0329) | 2027 | 7 |
Declared limits
- · No adjustment for age or class (the historical census lacks them): bias in favour of the productive veteran.
- · Physical measurements and the combine are not in the model: they are shown as context.
- · Calibrated on the NCAA only: ACB, EuroLeague and FIBA are not scored.
- · The mocks' history starts on 2026-09-13: before that date there is none (the ingester overwrote them daily).