Professional DNA

Dean Garrett: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2001-02 · 34 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2001-02

The question

What kind of player is Dean Garrett?

The evidence

Dean Garrett · Defensive impact: 42th percentile (DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

42 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-8) · 379 players with a sample in 2001-02

Dean Garrett: what moved most is Rebounding

31 percentilcompared against: 83 percentil (-52) · Dean Garrett, from 1996-97 to 1999-00

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 5.4 minutes per game across 34 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 42th percentile
DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 379 players with a sample in 2001-02. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring0th percentile
1.1 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
0.1 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact42th percentile
DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding16th percentile
1.7 rebounds per game

Limitations

Defensive impact42th percentile
Average · DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Rebounding16th percentile
Very low · 1.7 rebounds per game
Scoring0th percentile
Very low · 1.1 points per game
Playmaking0th percentile
Very low · 0.1 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 54th percentile → 0th percentile (-54) · Playmaking: 20th percentile → 0th percentile (-20) · Rebounding: 87th percentile → 16th percentile (-71)

1996-9787th percentile
68 games · 24.5 minutes per game
Scoring
54th percentile
Playmaking
20th percentile
Rebounding
87th percentile
1997-9890th percentile
82 games · 32.1 minutes per game
Scoring
47th percentile
Playmaking
37th percentile
Rebounding
90th percentile
1998-9973th percentile
49 games · 21.5 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
19th percentile
Rebounding
73th percentile
1999-0034th percentile
56 games · 10.8 minutes per game
Scoring
5th percentile
Playmaking
7th percentile
Rebounding
34th percentile
2000-0144th percentile
70 games · 11.9 minutes per game
Scoring
9th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
44th percentile
2001-0216th percentile
34 games · 5.4 minutes per game
Scoring
0th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
16th percentile

Context

2001-02 · 34 games · 5.4 minutes per game · Percentile against 379 measured players in 2001-02 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2001-02 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.