SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Bill Curley: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 20 games

45

percentil

Bill Curley
Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is Bill Curley?

The evidence

Bill Curley · Defensive impact: 45th percentile (DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

45 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-5) · 375 players with a sample in 2000-01

Bill Curley: what moved most is Rebounding

16 percentilcompared against: 34 percentil (-18) · Bill Curley, from 1994-95 to 1998-99

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 9.6 minutes per game across 20 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 45th percentile

    DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 375 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring13th percentile

    3.2 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    0.2 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact45th percentile

    DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding20th percentile

    1.9 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact45th percentile

    Average · DBPM -0.2: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Rebounding20th percentile

    Very low · 1.9 rebounds per game

  • Scoring13th percentile

    Very low · 3.2 points per game

  • Playmaking3th percentile

    Very low · 0.2 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 8th percentile → 13th percentile (+5) · Playmaking: 11th percentile → 3th percentile (-8) · Rebounding: 31th percentile → 20th percentile (-11)

  • 1994-9531th percentile

    53 games · 11.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    8th percentile
    Playmaking
    11th percentile
    Rebounding
    31th percentile
  • 1997-9837th percentile

    11 games · 13.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    8th percentile
    Rebounding
    37th percentile
  • 1998-9910th percentile

    35 games · 10.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    4th percentile
    Playmaking
    8th percentile
    Rebounding
    10th percentile
  • 1999-0019th percentile

    28 games · 11.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    13th percentile
    Rebounding
    19th percentile
  • 2000-0120th percentile

    20 games · 9.6 minutes per game

    Scoring
    13th percentile
    Playmaking
    3th percentile
    Rebounding
    20th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 20 games · 9.6 minutes per game · Percentile against 375 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.