Professional DNA

Jim McIlvaine: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2000-01 · 18 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2000-01

The question

What kind of player is Jim McIlvaine?

The evidence

Jim McIlvaine · Defensive impact: 96th percentile (DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

96 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+46) · 376 players with a sample in 2000-01

Jim McIlvaine: what moved most is Rebounding

20 percentilcompared against: 47 percentil (-27) · Jim McIlvaine, from 1995-96 to 2000-01

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 10.7 minutes per game across 18 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 96th percentile
DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 376 players with a sample in 2000-01. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring3th percentile
1.6 points per game
Playmaking3th percentile
0.2 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact96th percentile
DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding20th percentile
1.9 rebounds per game

Strengths

Defensive impact96th percentile
Elite · DBPM 2.0: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

Rebounding20th percentile
Very low · 1.9 rebounds per game
Scoring3th percentile
Very low · 1.6 points per game
Playmaking3th percentile
Very low · 0.2 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 4th percentile → 3th percentile (-1) · Playmaking: 0th percentile → 3th percentile (+3) · Rebounding: 44th percentile → 20th percentile (-24)

1995-9644th percentile
80 games · 14.9 minutes per game
Scoring
4th percentile
Playmaking
0th percentile
Rebounding
44th percentile
1996-9761th percentile
82 games · 18.0 minutes per game
Scoring
22th percentile
Playmaking
5th percentile
Rebounding
61th percentile
1997-9849th percentile
78 games · 15.5 minutes per game
Scoring
16th percentile
Playmaking
1th percentile
Rebounding
49th percentile
1998-9932th percentile
22 games · 12.2 minutes per game
Scoring
4th percentile
Playmaking
1th percentile
Rebounding
32th percentile
1999-0051th percentile
66 games · 15.9 minutes per game
Scoring
8th percentile
Playmaking
13th percentile
Rebounding
51th percentile
2000-0120th percentile
18 games · 10.7 minutes per game
Scoring
3th percentile
Playmaking
3th percentile
Rebounding
20th percentile

Context

2000-01 · 18 games · 10.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 376 measured players in 2000-01 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2000-01 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-07

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.