SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Calbert Cheaney: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2005-06 · 42 games

48

percentil

Calbert Cheaney
Confidence: lowData through: 2005-06

The question

What kind of player is Calbert Cheaney?

The evidence

Calbert Cheaney · Defensive impact: 48th percentile (DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

48 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (-2) · 404 players with a sample in 2005-06

Calbert Cheaney: what moved most is Rebounding

36 percentilcompared against: 27 percentil (+9) · Calbert Cheaney, from 2000-01 to 2001-02

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 10.7 minutes per game across 42 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 48th percentile

    DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 404 players with a sample in 2005-06. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring9th percentile

    2.2 points per game

  • Playmaking21th percentile

    0.5 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact48th percentile

    DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding12th percentile

    1.5 rebounds per game

Limitations

  • Defensive impact48th percentile

    Average · DBPM -0.1: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Playmaking21th percentile

    Very low · 0.5 assists per game

  • Rebounding12th percentile

    Very low · 1.5 rebounds per game

  • Scoring9th percentile

    Very low · 2.2 points per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 7th percentile → 9th percentile (+2) · Playmaking: 35th percentile → 21th percentile (-14) · Rebounding: 27th percentile → 12th percentile (-15)

  • 2000-0127th percentile

    9 games · 17.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    7th percentile
    Playmaking
    35th percentile
    Rebounding
    27th percentile
  • 2001-0249th percentile

    68 games · 24.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    51th percentile
    Playmaking
    55th percentile
    Rebounding
    49th percentile
  • 2002-0348th percentile

    81 games · 29.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    59th percentile
    Playmaking
    63th percentile
    Rebounding
    48th percentile
  • 2003-0446th percentile

    79 games · 26.2 minutes per game

    Scoring
    53th percentile
    Playmaking
    54th percentile
    Rebounding
    46th percentile
  • 2004-0525th percentile

    55 games · 17.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    24th percentile
    Playmaking
    42th percentile
    Rebounding
    25th percentile
  • 2005-0612th percentile

    42 games · 10.7 minutes per game

    Scoring
    9th percentile
    Playmaking
    21th percentile
    Rebounding
    12th percentile

Context

2005-06 · 42 games · 10.7 minutes per game · Percentile against 404 measured players in 2005-06 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 2005-06 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.