Professional DNA

Cherokee Parks: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 2003-04 · 12 games

percentil

Confidence: lowData through: 2003-04

The question

What kind of player is Cherokee Parks?

The evidence

Cherokee Parks · Defensive impact: 63th percentile (DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

63 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+13) · 373 players with a sample in 2003-04

Cherokee Parks: what moved most is Rebounding

2 percentilcompared against: 49 percentil (-47) · Cherokee Parks, from 1998-99 to 2003-04

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
RoleShort rotation: 5.3 minutes per game across 12 games
What sets them apartDefensive impact · 63th percentile
DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 373 players with a sample in 2003-04. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

Scoring1th percentile
1.0 points per game
Playmaking1th percentile
0.1 assists per game
Outside shootingno data
no data
Defensive impact63th percentile
DBPM 0.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player
Finishing at the rimno data
no data
Rebounding2th percentile
0.8 rebounds per game

Limitations

Rebounding2th percentile
Very low · 0.8 rebounds per game
Scoring1th percentile
Very low · 1.0 points per game
Playmaking1th percentile
Very low · 0.1 assists per game
Axes without enough sample
Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 32th percentile → 1th percentile (-31) · Playmaking: 28th percentile → 1th percentile (-27) · Rebounding: 73th percentile → 2th percentile (-71)

1998-9973th percentile
48 games · 23.3 minutes per game
Scoring
32th percentile
Playmaking
28th percentile
Rebounding
73th percentile
1999-0047th percentile
56 games · 14.4 minutes per game
Scoring
14th percentile
Playmaking
18th percentile
Rebounding
47th percentile
2000-0151th percentile
65 games · 16.2 minutes per game
Scoring
27th percentile
Playmaking
24th percentile
Rebounding
51th percentile
2001-0211th percentile
42 games · 5.6 minutes per game
Scoring
2th percentile
Playmaking
4th percentile
Rebounding
11th percentile
2002-0363th percentile
30 games · 21.6 minutes per game
Scoring
42th percentile
Playmaking
20th percentile
Rebounding
63th percentile
2003-042th percentile
12 games · 5.3 minutes per game
Scoring
1th percentile
Playmaking
1th percentile
Rebounding
2th percentile

Context

2003-04 · 12 games · 5.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 373 measured players in 2003-04 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
It portrays the 2003-04 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

What if…?

What happened to his team when he did not play

Career atlas

When his game changed, season by season

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season

Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.