SportiveWorld

Professional DNA

Mark Eaton: PROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET

Defensive impact · 1992-93 · 64 games

89

percentil

Mark Eaton
Confidence: lowData through: 1992-93

The question

What kind of player is Mark Eaton?

The evidence

Mark Eaton · Defensive impact: 89th percentile (DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player)

89 percentilcompared against: 50 percentil (+39) · 343 players with a sample in 1992-93

Mark Eaton: what moved most is Rebounding

62 percentilcompared against: 90 percentil (-28) · Mark Eaton, from 1987-88 to 1992-93

The read

What they are, the role they held and what sets them apart. Every line comes from a figure further down this same page.

  • What they arePROFILE NOT COMPLETE YET
  • RoleShort rotation: 17.3 minutes per game across 64 games
  • What sets them apartDefensive impact · 89th percentile

    DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

The axes, one by one

Every axis with its percentile against 343 players with a sample in 1992-93. An axis without enough sample says «no data» and is not filled in.

  • Scoring11th percentile

    2.8 points per game

  • Playmaking6th percentile

    0.3 assists per game

  • Outside shootingno data

    no data

  • Defensive impact89th percentile

    DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

  • Finishing at the rimno data

    no data

  • Rebounding62th percentile

    4.1 rebounds per game

Strengths

  • Defensive impact89th percentile

    Very high · DBPM 1.4: defensive impact per 100 possessions compared with an average player

Limitations

  • Scoring11th percentile

    Very low · 2.8 points per game

  • Playmaking6th percentile

    Very low · 0.3 assists per game

  • Axes without enough sample

    Outside shooting · Finishing at the rim

  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

Recent change

Scoring: 38th percentile → 11th percentile (-27) · Playmaking: 16th percentile → 6th percentile (-10) · Rebounding: 94th percentile → 62th percentile (-32)

  • 1987-8894th percentile

    82 games · 33.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    38th percentile
    Playmaking
    16th percentile
    Rebounding
    94th percentile
  • 1988-8998th percentile

    82 games · 35.5 minutes per game

    Scoring
    36th percentile
    Playmaking
    33th percentile
    Rebounding
    98th percentile
  • 1989-9087th percentile

    82 games · 27.8 minutes per game

    Scoring
    28th percentile
    Playmaking
    14th percentile
    Rebounding
    87th percentile
  • 1990-9192th percentile

    80 games · 32.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    29th percentile
    Playmaking
    17th percentile
    Rebounding
    92th percentile
  • 1991-9280th percentile

    81 games · 25.0 minutes per game

    Scoring
    15th percentile
    Playmaking
    11th percentile
    Rebounding
    80th percentile
  • 1992-9362th percentile

    64 games · 17.3 minutes per game

    Scoring
    11th percentile
    Playmaking
    6th percentile
    Rebounding
    62th percentile

Context

1992-93 · 64 games · 17.3 minutes per game · Percentile against 343 measured players in 1992-93 · SportiveWorld own data

FactDerivedAssumption

What this does not prove

  • Percentiles compare inside the NBA. Outside it they do not mean the same thing.
  • It portrays the 1992-93 season, already closed. It is not what comes next.
  • This DNA profile does not include movement or touch data.

From here

Where it comes from

Source

not stated

Model input

not stated

Computation

not stated

This answer

2026-11-06

Where this comes from

Season averages · closed season · its clock is the seasonBox scores · closed season · its clock is the season
Rights: Licensed data: viewable here; ask before redistributing.